ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Wavelength dependence of fine spatial resolution in human vision.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wavelength influences multiple aspects of visual performance, yet its role in spatial resolution remains incompletely understood due to confounding factors such as luminance differences, chromatic aberration, and intraocular scatter. This study assessed how narrowband light of different wavelengths affects two-point separation thresholds under controlled stimulus and ocular conditions. Action spectra for fine spatial resolution were measured using an equal-energy approach. Sixty healthy young adults (mean age: 22.7 ± 3.3 years) with normal vision were tested in a two-point resolution task. Narrowband stimuli (420-660 nm) and a broadband white condition were produced by a 1,000-W Xenon arc lamp with interference filters. Participants were preselected for optimal acuity. Thresholds, defined as the minimum resolvable separation between two-point sources (two-point separation thresholds), were recorded using a digital micrometer, and converted to visual angle for analysis. Separation thresholds varied significantly with wavelength with short-wave light (420 nm) yielding poorer resolution compared to long-wave light (660 nm). Iris pigmentation (color, lightness, and a combination of color + lightness) also influenced performance with lighter irides associated with higher thresholds, and the largest group differences observed at short wavelengths. Two-point resolution shows systematic wavelength dependence under equal-energy conditions, with performance degraded in the short-wave range. These effects likely reflect the combined influence of chromatic aberration, optical scatter, and photoreceptor sampling, rather than scatter alone. Consideration of both optical and neural mechanisms is essential when interpreting wavelength-dependent changes in spatial vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.