ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Tumor budding in non-small cell lung cancer: a new prognostic frontier?
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advancements in treatment methods, prognosis can vary among patients with the same stage of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Tumor budding (Tb) in the tumor microenvironment is increasingly studied to improve prognostic accuracy. This study aims to compare the prognostic value of Tb with established factors in NSCLC patients who underwent surgery. This retrospective study included NSCLC patients operated on between January 2018 and December 2023. Data collected included clinical and pathological characteristics, tumor type, stage, spread through air spaces (STAS), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), and survival times. Tb was assessed in peritumoral (pBd1-2-3) and intratumoral (iBd1-2-3) areas using the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference criteria. The relationship between pBd and iBd with prognostic factors, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed. Patients with pBd2 and pBd3 had a significantly higher presence of STAS, LVI, and PNI than those with pBd1 (p = 0.025, p = 0.027, p = 0.003). No significant differences were found between iBd groups (p = 0.799). There was no significant difference in DFS among pBd groups (p = 0.925). No significant difference in OS was observed between pBd and iBd groups (p = 0.799 and p = 0.943). In the multivariate analysis, although many factors did not reach independent significance likely due to the limited cohort size, iBd2 emerged as a potential independent prognostic indicator for both DFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.006). These findings, while exploratory due to the small sample size, suggest that iBd may provide additional prognostic value beyond conventional parameters. Tb's association with known prognostic factors suggests it may aid in lung cancer prognosis. Standardized assessment and routine pathological evaluation could impact treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42213351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.