Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42213351›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2026

Tumor budding in non-small cell lung cancer: a new prognostic frontier?

Hüseyin Çakmak, Kadir Baturhan Çiflik, Seda Aktürk, Banu İnce Alkan, Büşra Özdemir Çiflik, Muhammet Ali Beyoğlu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hüseyin ÇakmakDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ankara Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0294-609X
Kadir Baturhan ÇiflikDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Kırıkkale Yüksek İhtisas Hospital, Kırıkkale, Turkey. baturhanciflik@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5964-3778
Seda AktürkDepartment of Pathology, Ankara Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-7703
Banu İnce AlkanDepartment of Pathology, Ankara Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3481-8022
Büşra Özdemir ÇiflikFaculty of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-1142
Muhammet Ali BeyoğluDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ankara Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4038-630X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advancements in treatment methods, prognosis can vary among patients with the same stage of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Tumor budding (Tb) in the tumor microenvironment is increasingly studied to improve prognostic accuracy. This study aims to compare the prognostic value of Tb with established factors in NSCLC patients who underwent surgery. This retrospective study included NSCLC patients operated on between January 2018 and December 2023. Data collected included clinical and pathological characteristics, tumor type, stage, spread through air spaces (STAS), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), and survival times. Tb was assessed in peritumoral (pBd1-2-3) and intratumoral (iBd1-2-3) areas using the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference criteria. The relationship between pBd and iBd with prognostic factors, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed. Patients with pBd2 and pBd3 had a significantly higher presence of STAS, LVI, and PNI than those with pBd1 (p = 0.025, p = 0.027, p = 0.003). No significant differences were found between iBd groups (p = 0.799). There was no significant difference in DFS among pBd groups (p = 0.925). No significant difference in OS was observed between pBd and iBd groups (p = 0.799 and p = 0.943). In the multivariate analysis, although many factors did not reach independent significance likely due to the limited cohort size, iBd2 emerged as a potential independent prognostic indicator for both DFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.006). These findings, while exploratory due to the small sample size, suggest that iBd may provide additional prognostic value beyond conventional parameters. Tb's association with known prognostic factors suggests it may aid in lung cancer prognosis. Standardized assessment and routine pathological evaluation could impact treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Histopathological evaluationİntratumoral buddingPeritumoral buddingSurgical resection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.