ArticleMaxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery2026
Impact of surgeon experience level on outcomes of three different root coverage procedures for RT1 gingival recession.
Article in Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGingival recession (GR) is a common dental condition. Root coverage procedures (RCPs) aim to restore the gingival margin to its original position and maximize root surface coverage. The impact of surgeon experience on surgical outcomes has not been systematically evaluated. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the impact of surgeon experience level on the outcomes of 3 different RCPs for RT1 GR by comprehensively assessing clinical and esthetic parameters before and after surgery.
resultsA total of 304 patients (1,020 teeth) were included in this study. Surgeons with more than 5 years of experience achieved a significantly higher percentage of root coverage (PRC) (96.34 ± 10.95%) and significantly lower clinical attachment level (CAL) values (1.20 ± 0.42 mm) than less experienced surgeons (p < 0.05). Notably, surgical duration decreased markedly with increasing surgical experience (p < 0.0001). The root coverage esthetic score (RES) did not differ significantly among the three groups. Group A demonstrated higher mucosal scar index (MSI) values for the coronally advanced flap combined with connective tissue graft (CAF + CTG).
conclusionSurgeon experience level is associated with clinical efficacy and surgical efficiency in RCPs, with more experienced surgeons achieving superior PRC and attachment gain. Esthetic outcomes were comparable across experience levels. Additionally, more experienced surgeons had shorter operative times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.