ReviewAnnals of surgical oncology2026
The Past, Present, and Future of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer.
Review in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), the current gold standard for axillary staging for many breast cancer patients, has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for clinically node-negative patients due to lower surgical morbidity while maintaining oncologic safety. Advances in breast cancer surgery, axillary staging, lymphatic mapping, targeted axillary dissection (TAD), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification techniques have reshaped axillary management and enabled progressive de-escalation of surgical treatment. This review examines the historical development, current clinical applications, and emerging innovations in SLNB. Early randomized trials including the NSABP B-32 and ALMANAC trials established SLNB as a safe alternative to ALND for clinically node-negative patients with comparable overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and regional control while significantly reducing complications such as lymphedema. Subsequent trials including ACOSOG Z0011, IBCSG 23-01, and AMAROS further supported omission of completion ALND (cALND) for selected patients with limited SLN metastases. In the neoadjuvant setting, studies such as ACOSOG Z1071, SENTINA, and SN-FNAC evaluated SLNB accuracy after NAC and informed the development of optimized techniques, including dual-tracer mapping and TAD, to reduce false-negative rates. Technological advances including indocyanine green fluorescence imaging, technetium-99m radiotracers, and superparamagnetic iron oxide tracers have further improved SLN identification. Ongoing trials investigating SLNB omission and imaging-guided axillary staging continue to refine patient selection and advance the shift toward personalized, morbidity-conscious axillary management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.