ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2026
An Analytical Framework for Phenotypic Selection of Fitness-Conferring Genes.
Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phenotypic selection can cause the transient, selective upregulation of fitness-conferring genes in isogenic cell populations under stress, producing selective enrichment of the fitness gene relative to a neutral reference gene. While computational models have shown that such enrichment requires noisy gene expression and a cellular memory linking growth rate to gene expression (Ciechonska et al. 2022), the precise mechanistic requirements and the analytical principles governing enrichment have remained unclear. Here, we present an exact analytical framework that unifies enrichment mechanisms across both growth-driven and death-driven selection regimes. By analysing a stochastic model of explicit mRNA and protein dynamics, we prove that when selection acts via cell division, the fitness advantage of faster growth is exactly cancelled by the penalty of faster protein dilution. We show that this cancellation is bypassed by translational feedback but not by transcriptional feedback alone; for genes with regulated (switching) promoters, the promoter-state memory provides an independent route to enrichment without translational feedback. Conversely, when selection acts via cell death, this exact cancellation is bypassed, allowing selective enrichment to emerge from baseline gene expression noise without any assumptions about growth-related feedback loops or regulated vs constitutive expression. We derive an exact fluctuation-response relation demonstrating that, in all cases, enrichment scales with the super-Poissonian component of unperturbed protein noise times the relevant memory timescale. All analytical predictions are corroborated by stochastic simulations of a finite-population Moran model. These results have implications for the emergence of drug resistance: by transiently enriching survival-conferring phenotypes, phenotypic selection can extend the window during which cell division occurs under stress, increasing the opportunity for permanent genetic mutations to arise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.