ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2026
Non-Invasive Sampling of Odours from Tiger (Panthera tigris) and Leopard (Panthera pardus) for Wildlife Conservation.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chemical cues play an important role in mammalian communication, often reflecting an individual's physiological state. Non-invasive sampling of such informative cues holds great potential for wildlife monitoring. Endangered apex predators such as big cats are elusive and challenging to monitor. While existing monitoring techniques estimate numbers or densities, they often fail to provide crucial demographic and physiological information. We adapted a headspace solid-phase field sampling technique adapted for sampling volatiles from urine and faeces of captive Bengal tigers and Indian leopards of known age and sex, and from urine of identified wild Bengal tigers of known age, sex, and reproductive status. Volatiles extracted from these samples were analysed using Thermal Desorption- Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. The random forest algorithm was used to identify compounds that might be cues for species, age, sex, and reproductive state. Species classification accuracy was consistently high with both urine (0.79 + 0.009) and scat (0.75 + 0.029) volatiles. Classification accuracy of urine volatiles was high for females and young individuals in leopards and tigers, but lower for males and old individuals. Scat volatiles performed better across groups. We also identified putative chemical markers for epilepsy and reproductive state in tigers. This study presents the first chemical characterization of tiger and leopard scats and the first sampling of tiger odours from the wild. Our simple and cost-effective method of sampling tiger and leopard odours offers a novel method of chemical fingerprinting to monitor populations in situ. Importantly, this sampling method and analytical pipeline is broadly applicable to other mammalian species for conservation and ecological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42213247What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.