Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42213219›Full record

ArticlePurinergic signalling2026

Turning failure into success: how artificial intelligence can help personalize therapies and re-use patient data.

Maria P Abbracchio, Ernesto Damiani

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Purinergic signalling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02245737 (A 24-month, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Biomarker, and Pharmacokinetic Study of AZD3293 in Early Alzheimer's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02245737 phase2 / phase3terminatednot on this map

A 24-month, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Biomarker, and Pharmacokinetic Study of AZD3293 in Early Alzheimer's Disease (The AMARANTH Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2014 to 2018Enrolled2,218ConditionsAlzheimer´s DiseaseArmsLanabecestat, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria P AbbracchioUniversità Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy. mariapia.abbracchio@unimi.it.
Ernesto DamianiUniversità Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite robust preclinical evidence, many clinical trials, including several that targeted the purinergic system, fail to demonstrate efficacy in humans. Failure may stem from inability to accurately identify patient subgroups responding similarly to treatments. Here, we explore the potential of artificial intelligence to revolutionize how we group and classify patients in clinical studies. We introduce a new framework using Large Language Models-generated embeddings of detailed patient data, to create a semantic-aware latent space, enabling us to identify truly meaningful patients' clusters. Large Language Models can provide explainable groupings, giving clear reasons why certain patients respond similarly to treatments. We present an example of successful application of this approach through the re-analysis of the AMARANTH clinical trial (NCT02245737, involving ~ 2200 patients and completed in 2018) testing Lanabecestat, a BACE1 inhibitor decreasing β-amyloid production in Alzheimer's disease, for which traditional analysis reported no efficacy. As in the original trial, our simulation showed no overall benefit. However, re-analysis per patients' clusters and subjects' re-stratification by semantic similarities (shared symptom profiles, progression patterns) identified a patients' subgroup in one of the clusters showing Lanabecestat-associated slower disease worsening, thus succeeding where the full trial had failed. By making a new therapy available to at least a subset of patients with a defined disease, this new approach may help maximize the return on drug development and reduce the burden on healthcare. Moreover, it will significantly improve the precision, efficiency and interpretability of clinical trials, paving the way for a new era of personalized medical treatments.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseArtificial IntelligencePrecision MedicineClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicArtificial intelligenceClinical trialsLarge language modelsPatient stratificationPrecision medicinePurinergic signalling

Identifiers

PMID42213219
PMCPMC13221484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.