ArticlePurinergic signalling2026
Turning failure into success: how artificial intelligence can help personalize therapies and re-use patient data.
Article in Purinergic signalling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02245737 (A 24-month, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Biomarker, and Pharmacokinetic Study of AZD3293 in Early Alzheimer's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A 24-month, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, Biomarker, and Pharmacokinetic Study of AZD3293 in Early Alzheimer's Disease (The AMARANTH Study)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Is adenosine signalling entering the precision medicine era? From receptor pharmacology to patient stratification.Purinergic signalling · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite robust preclinical evidence, many clinical trials, including several that targeted the purinergic system, fail to demonstrate efficacy in humans. Failure may stem from inability to accurately identify patient subgroups responding similarly to treatments. Here, we explore the potential of artificial intelligence to revolutionize how we group and classify patients in clinical studies. We introduce a new framework using Large Language Models-generated embeddings of detailed patient data, to create a semantic-aware latent space, enabling us to identify truly meaningful patients' clusters. Large Language Models can provide explainable groupings, giving clear reasons why certain patients respond similarly to treatments. We present an example of successful application of this approach through the re-analysis of the AMARANTH clinical trial (NCT02245737, involving ~ 2200 patients and completed in 2018) testing Lanabecestat, a BACE1 inhibitor decreasing β-amyloid production in Alzheimer's disease, for which traditional analysis reported no efficacy. As in the original trial, our simulation showed no overall benefit. However, re-analysis per patients' clusters and subjects' re-stratification by semantic similarities (shared symptom profiles, progression patterns) identified a patients' subgroup in one of the clusters showing Lanabecestat-associated slower disease worsening, thus succeeding where the full trial had failed. By making a new therapy available to at least a subset of patients with a defined disease, this new approach may help maximize the return on drug development and reduce the burden on healthcare. Moreover, it will significantly improve the precision, efficiency and interpretability of clinical trials, paving the way for a new era of personalized medical treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.