ArticleEuropean journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie2026
Long-Term Recall Error in Retrospective Family Surveys: Cohabitation Histories in Denmark.
Article in European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recall questions provide the possibility of obtaining longitudinal information in cross-sectional surveys and are often used in family research. Yet, recall instruments may suffer from measurement issues. This study links a recent cross-sectional survey that includes recall histories of all unions involving cohabitation to administrative cohabitation records for Denmark and assesses the recall error in cohabitation status histories. Under mild assumptions, it distinguishes recall error from other survey error types, allowing for assessing the increase in recall error as time to the recalled period increases. The quality of recall for living with a partner decreases in a linear fashion by 0.5-0.6% points per year on average over a 20-year period. Results are robust to a series of sensitivity tests. The presented estimate of recall error for cohabitation status likely provides a lower bound for general recall error and shows by example how regression calibration methods can be used to correct for recall error even if only a small random subset of data includes true values. Recall instruments used in family research are prone to recall error, and failing to account for this may lead to biased estimates especially for longer recall periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.