Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42213209›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026

Operative timing and surgical complexity in hand trauma: a multicenter analysis of replantation and non-replantation centers in Germany.

Antek Nicklas, Patrick Will Marks, Adrian Dragu, Hannah Schmidt, Andre Rotärmel, HandTraumaRegister DGH

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Antek NicklasUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. antek.nicklas@ukdd.de.
Patrick Will MarksUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Adrian DraguUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Hannah SchmidtAcademy for Trauma Surgery (AUC), Munich, Germany.
Andre RotärmelUniversity Center for Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
HandTraumaRegister DGH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHand injuries are common traumatic conditions that often require specialized surgical care. Differences in hospital structures and levels of specialization may influence the timeliness and complexity of treatment. This study evaluates quality of care across different hospital types, focusing on time-to-skin-incision and surgical management of finger and hand injuries. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective multicenter study is based on data from the HandTraumaRegister of the German Society for Hand Surgery (HTR DGH). A total of 16,726 surgically treated cases with documented finger or hand injuries recorded between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed. Hospitals were categorized as non-replantation centers, replantation centers, or FESSH-accredited replantation centers. Demographic characteristics, injury-patterns, treatment modalities, and time-related parameters were assessed. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, group comparisons, and multivariate regression models to evaluate factors associated with time-to-skin-incision.

resultsThe study population consisted predominantly of male patients (75.79%), and 91.6% were right-handed. Soft tissue injuries without fractures or amputations accounted for 46.57% of cases. Non-replantation centers demonstrated the longest time-to-skin-incision (median 13 h), whereas replantation centers (median 3.75 h) and FESSH-accredited centers (median 4 h) showed significantly shorter times. Treatment strategies differed significantly between center types (p < 0.001), with non-replantation centers performing more secondary procedures. Replantations or revascularizations were performed in 3.96% of cases, with the highest proportion observed in FESSH-accredited centers (4.64%). Operative durations were significantly longer in replantation centers, particularly for complex and amputation injuries (p < 0.001).

conclusionSpecialized replantation centers are associated with shorter access times to surgical care compared to non-replantation centers. Longer operative times observed in highly specialized and FESSH-accredited centers may reflect greater injury complexity as well as the technical demands of advanced microsurgical procedures, rather than indicating differences in care quality. These findings highlight the potential relevance of specialized care structures in the management of severe finger injuries.

Indexed as

Hand InjuriesOperative TimeReplantationTime-to-TreatmentAdolescentAdultFemaleFinger InjuriesGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAmputationExtensor tendon injuryFlexor tendon injuryHand surgeryHandTraumaRegister

Identifiers

PMID42213209
PMCPMC13221328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.