ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Bibliometric analysis of oncology communication from 1976 to 2025: a focus on narrative medicine.
Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical communication in oncology has become a central component of supportive cancer care, with direct implications for symptom management, psychosocial distress, decision-making, caregiver support, survivorship, and palliative transitions. This bibliometric analysis examined 949 documents indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection between 1976 and 2025 in order to map the field's intellectual structure, publication profile, and thematic development. The study combined PRISMA-guided corpus construction with bibliometric techniques including co-citation analysis, thematic clustering, and strategic mapping. The results show sustained growth across five decades, but also a distributed publication profile, moderate international collaboration, and only partial integration across citation communities. A major transition occurred between 2005 and 2007, when communication began to be framed less as information transfer and more as a therapeutic and relational component of care. Within this structure, narrative medicine remains visible mainly as a conceptual orientation rather than as a consolidated methodological line. Thematic development is stronger in psychosocial, patient-centered, and palliative communication than in digitally mediated, developmentally specific, participatory, or structurally informed approaches. Overall, the findings position oncology communication as an established but still uneven component of supportive care, with practical implications for multidisciplinary teams in nursing, psycho-oncology, social work, and palliative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.