ArticlePsychological research2026
Cross-modal training reduced susceptibility to the sound-induced flash illusion and generalized across stimulus onset asynchronies.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The sound-induced flash illusion (SiFI) is a typical auditory-dominated multisensory illusion, and its susceptibility can be modified by perceptual training. However, the effects of different training protocols and their transfer effects on SiFI remain unclear. The present study employed the SiFI paradigm combined with feedback training to examine the effects of different types of training on SiFI performance across multiple stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). SOA was manipulated in the pretest and posttest to determine whether training effects would generalize to untrained temporal intervals. Participants were assigned to four groups, including a control group that completed only the pretest and posttest and three training groups that received 5 days of combined training, audiovisual training, or visual-only training respectively. The results showed that perceptual training significantly improved performance on the SiFI task, but the magnitude of improvement differed across training modalities. Audiovisual and combined training were more effective than visual-only training, and these benefits generalized from the trained SOA to untrained SOAs, indicating transfer of the training effect across temporal intervals. These findings suggest that cross-modal training is more effective than unimodal visual training in reducing SiFI susceptibility and provide further evidence for the plasticity of multisensory perceptual processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42213190What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.