ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Enhanced fixation in sacral fragility fractures: the role of the transsacral bar in preventing screw loosening.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMechanical failure after minimally invasive posterior pelvic fixation remains a major challenge in elderly patients with sacral fragility fractures (SFF), particularly in the presence of severe osteoporosis. Multiple bilateral fixation strategies are currently used, yet their relative mechanical reliability remains poorly understood. This study compared four commonly applied bilateral constructs, with a specific focus on the biomechanical behavior of the transsacral bar (TSB).
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted including 164 patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent minimally invasive fixation for Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis (FFP) Types II-IV between 2018 and 2025. Patients were treated using one of four standardized constructs: (1) two long transsacral screws (2LS), (2) a hybrid configuration combining one long with two short screws (1L2S), (3) four short iliosacral screws placed in a multiplanar arrangement (4 S), or (4) a TSB construct applied either as a dual-bar configuration or combined with antirotational screws. The primary endpoint was radiographic loosening at 3 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included operative time, pain trajectories, early mobility, and complications. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of loosening.
resultsImplant loosening occurred in 17% of patients after 2LS, 6% after 1L2S, and 4% after 4 S fixation, whereas no loosening was observed following TSB fixation (p = 0.013). Operative duration differed among techniques, with the TSB group averaging 70.6 min. Pain improved in most patients by 3 months and continued to decline at 12 months. Mobility recovery was favorable across all groups. Regression analysis identified fixation technique as the only independent predictor of loosening (p = 0.0055). No mechanical failures or revisions occurred in the TSB cohort.
conclusionsDespite all constructs being bilateral, their mechanical behavior differed substantially. The TSB construct demonstrated the highest stability, with no cases of loosening, suggesting a distinct biomechanical advantage in osteoporotic sacral fixation. This advantage likely relates to transiliac cortical anchorage combined with locking-nut-mediated preload, which may reduce implant micromotion. These findings support the TSB as a robust fixation option in elderly patients with compromised bone quality. Prospective studies are warranted to further delineate its clinical role across varying fracture patterns. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42213182What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.