GuidelineEuropean radiology2026
ESR Essentials: imaging of melanoma-practice recommendations by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging.
Guideline in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Staging and response assessment of melanoma is a challenging radiological task as the tumor entity is characterized by atypical metastatic phenotypes and response patterns. Radiologists should scrutinize diagnostic images for unusual metastatic sites, including, e.g., gastrointestinal, endobronchial, or splenic metastases. Routine imaging modalities must include body CT or PET/CT staging and brain MRI. Response assessment is complicated by pseudoprogression and dissociated response, which radiologists must identify and communicate with the treating physicians. Criteria-based reporting with immune-adapted response criteria, such as iRECIST, should be used. The abundant use of checkpoint inhibitor therapy should make radiologists aware of immune-related adverse events, which must be detected early. In addition, imaging professionals must carefully identify potential side effects that mimic progression, in particular sarcoid-like reactions with newly developed mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy, as this will ensure that progressive disease is not overcalled. Additionally, radiologists should be aware of the emerging field of intratumoral immunotherapy, which can result in local inflammatory changes at injection sites that may also mimic progression. For this, a dedicated adaptation of the response criteria may be applied with itRECIST. KEY POINTS: The staging of melanoma should factor in the possibility of atypical metastatic patterns. For response assessment, radiologists should be aware of the differential response patterns. Common side effects that may mimic progression should be carefully identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42213112What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.