Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42213112›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2026

ESR Essentials: imaging of melanoma-practice recommendations by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging.

Wolfgang G Kunz, Pietro A Bonaffini, Giulia A Zamboni, Giovanni Cappello, Doris Leithner, Marius E Mayerhoefer

Abstract readReviewPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wolfgang G KunzDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. wolfgang.kunz@med.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5021-1952
Pietro A BonaffiniDepartment of Radiology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Giulia A ZamboniInstitute of Radiology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Policlinico GB Rossi, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni CappelloRadiology Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo (Turin), Italy.
Doris LeithnerDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Marius E MayerhoeferDepartment of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Staging and response assessment of melanoma is a challenging radiological task as the tumor entity is characterized by atypical metastatic phenotypes and response patterns. Radiologists should scrutinize diagnostic images for unusual metastatic sites, including, e.g., gastrointestinal, endobronchial, or splenic metastases. Routine imaging modalities must include body CT or PET/CT staging and brain MRI. Response assessment is complicated by pseudoprogression and dissociated response, which radiologists must identify and communicate with the treating physicians. Criteria-based reporting with immune-adapted response criteria, such as iRECIST, should be used. The abundant use of checkpoint inhibitor therapy should make radiologists aware of immune-related adverse events, which must be detected early. In addition, imaging professionals must carefully identify potential side effects that mimic progression, in particular sarcoid-like reactions with newly developed mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy, as this will ensure that progressive disease is not overcalled. Additionally, radiologists should be aware of the emerging field of intratumoral immunotherapy, which can result in local inflammatory changes at injection sites that may also mimic progression. For this, a dedicated adaptation of the response criteria may be applied with itRECIST. KEY POINTS: The staging of melanoma should factor in the possibility of atypical metastatic patterns. For response assessment, radiologists should be aware of the differential response patterns. Common side effects that may mimic progression should be carefully identified.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingMelanomaDisease ProgressionEuropeHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasm StagingSocieties, MedicalImmunotherapyMelanoma, ImagingPseudoprogression

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.