Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42213103›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Does Patient History Influence Capsular Contracture? An Exploratory Analysis with Machine Learning.

Thomas M Johnstone, Daniel Najafali, Jennifer K Shah, Justin M Camacho, Chancellor Johnstone, Rahim S Nazerali, Gordon K Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas M Johnstone *Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Daniel Najafali *Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA. danieln6@illinois.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-9229
Jennifer K ShahDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Justin M CamachoDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Chancellor JohnstoneAir Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH, USA.
Rahim S NazeraliDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Gordon K LeeDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. gordokl1@hs.uci.edu.

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR003142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCapsular contracture (CC) is a frequent and distressing complication of breast augmentation and reconstruction. Although numerous patient-, surgical-, and implant-related risk factors have been proposed, reliable population-level predictors remain inconsistent across studies. This study evaluates whether administrative medical history, as encoded by ICD and CPT codes, contains sufficient predictive signal to identify patients at risk for CC using machine learning.

methodsPatients were queried from the Merative

resultsA total of 112,489 patients were included, and the rate of capsular contracture was 9.55%. In total, 4,825 common conditions and procedures were included as features in the model. The random forest's error rate was 9.54%. Prior CC was the most important variable in the model. When removed, model accuracy decreased by 0.0011% (p <0.001). Removing prior irradiation as a feature decreased model accuracy by 0.00014% (p < 0.001). In line with the previous literature, prior CC (OR = 2.47, p <0.001) and irradiation (OR = 1.16, p <0.001) were significantly associated with CC development in a multivariable logistic regression model.

conclusionsAdministrative medical history alone demonstrated limited predictive utility for CC development. Although established associations such as prior CC and irradiation were confirmed, their incremental contribution to predictive performance was negligible. These associations do not meaningfully enhance a clinician's ability to reliably predict which patients are at increased risk for CC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsImplant Capsular ContractureMachine LearningMammaplastyAdultDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentAlloplastic reconstructionArtificial intelligenceBreastBreast implantsBreast reconstructionCapsular contractureComplicationsContracture formationImplantImplant-based reconstructionImplant capsular contractureMachine learningMammaplastyOutcomes predictionPostoperative complicationsSupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID42213103
PMCPMC13433372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.