Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42213082›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2026

Implementation of a gait and balance battery of outcome measures in an inpatient rehabilitation hospital.

Leah Ling, Randy Carson, Geneviève N Olivier, Margaret A French

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leah LingDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-5194-278X
Randy CarsonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Craig H. Neilsen Rehabilitation Hospital, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States.
Geneviève N OlivierDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.
Margaret A FrenchDepartment of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3581-7374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceStandardized outcome measure batteries are important for tracking functional progress, enhancing communication among providers, and evaluating intervention effectiveness in physical therapy. However, implementation of standardized batteries is challenging due to time constraints, documentation requirements, and limited resources.

objectiveThe objective was to evaluate the implementation of a standardized gait and balance outcome measure battery by physical therapists for patients with stroke, brain injury, and spinal cord injury in the inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) setting.

designThis study used a retrospective cohort study of 773 episodes of care at the IRF, and a quantitative survey for 22 staff physical therapists at the IRF.

settingThis study was conducted at a 50-bed IRF in the United States.

interventionsA standardized outcome measure battery with 5 measures (10 Meter Walk Test, 6 Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Functional Gait Assessment, and 5 Times Sit to Stand) was implemented by all physical therapist teams at the IRF. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main implementation outcomes were Penetration and Sustainability, assessed with retrospective cohort data, and Acceptability and Feasibility, assessed with the quantitative survey of physical therapists.

resultsThere was a significant improvement in the completion rates of all 5 outcome measures, with most measures exceeding a 70% completion rate threshold 1 year after implementation. Completion rates of the entire battery did not reach 70%. Physical therapists indicated that implementation of the battery resulted in positive practice changes, and that barriers to completion were patients' functional levels and the time required for completion.

conclusionsImplementation of a standardized outcome measure battery is feasible in the IRF setting. However, outcome measure completion rates may improve with a more condensed battery and with integration into clinical workflows. RELEVANCE: This study provides a practical model for IRFs to adopt and evaluate standardized outcome measure batteries that improve physical therapists' ability to assess physical function across health systems and settings.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesGaitOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostural BalanceSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultFemaleHospitals, RehabilitationHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRetrospective StudiesStroke Rehabilitationbrain injuriesmobilityOutcome assessment (health care)spinal cord injuriesstroke

Identifiers

PMID42213082
PMCPMC13403179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.