Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42212821›Full record

ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2026

Medication Exposure Definitions in Perinatal Pharmacoepidemiology: Implications for Pregnancy Studies.

Gabra Nohmie, Anick Bérard, Anton Pottegård, Mette Bliddal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabra NohmieMedications and Pregnancy Unit of the CHU Sainte-Justine Azrieli Research Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0999-3272
Anick BérardMedications and Pregnancy Unit of the CHU Sainte-Justine Azrieli Research Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7535-5517
Anton PottegårdDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy, and Environmental Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9314-5679
Mette BliddalDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy, and Environmental Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7637-3730

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure definitions in real-world pregnancy studies vary across studies, data sources, treatments and outcomes, yet their impact on prevalence estimates remains unexamined.

objectivesTo identify the most used exposure definitions during the 1st trimester and evaluate their impact on prevalence estimates:

methodsWe reviewed 400 randomly selected articles on medication use during pregnancy to identify exposure definitions. Using Danish health registers (1997-2024) and the Québec Pregnancy Cohort (1998-2015), we analysed chronic, as-needed, and acute medication use. Prevalence (per 1000) was calculated per definition, including: (1) ≥ 1 or (2) ≥ 2 filled prescriptions during 1st trimester; filled ≥ 1 prescription anytime between the 1st trimester or (3) 30 days, (4) 60 days, (5) 90 days, (6) 6 months before conception; filled a prescription during 1st trimester or before conception, (7) assuming 1 daily defined dose per day or (8) prescribed days overlapping 1st trimester. Trends across cohorts and medications were compared.

resultsWe analysed 1,524,075 pregnancies in Denmark and 229,000 in Québec, Canada. The most common exposure definitions identified from the literature were Definition 1 (83%), followed by Definition 3 (13%). Prevalence varied across definitions, with differential impacts depending on medication and type of use. Definition 6 (1st trimester or within the 6 months before conception) yielded the highest prevalence; Definition 2 (≥ 2 fills in 1st trimester) the lowest. Broader time-windows of exposure increased prevalence, with variation by medication. The prevalence of medication use, whether chronic or acute, showed less variation across definitions than that of as-needed medication.

conclusionsMedication exposure prevalence varied by definition and medication. Using ≥ 1 filled prescriptions in the 1st trimester yielded prevalence estimates comparable to those from more complex definitions, supporting its use as a pragmatic standard. Sensitivity analyses and transparent reporting of exposure definition are essential to ensure replicability and critical appraisal.

Indexed as

PharmacoepidemiologyPregnancy ComplicationsDenmarkFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstPrescription DrugsPrevalenceQuebecPrescription Drugs1st trimestercountry comparisonsdefinitionsmedication exposuretrends

Identifiers

PMID42212821
PMCPMC13522648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.