Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42212723›Full record

ReviewChemical research in toxicology2026

Democratizing Artificial Intelligence in Toxicology: Real-World Applications and Automated Computational Workflows.

Kamel Mansouri, José Teófilo Moreira-Filho, Ricardo S Tieghi, Nicole Kleinstreuer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical research in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kamel MansouriNational Toxicology Program Interagency Center for Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), Division of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6426-8036
José Teófilo Moreira-FilhoNational Toxicology Program Interagency Center for Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), Division of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0777-280X
Ricardo S TieghiNational Toxicology Program Interagency Center for Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), Division of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-0763-6412
Nicole KleinstreuerNational Toxicology Program Interagency Center for Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), Division of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7914-3682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are transforming toxicological research and chemical safety assessment. Although user-friendly computational toxicology platforms are increasingly available, integrating, customizing, and deploying AI methods within end-to-end workflows still often requires programming expertise. This barrier increases the time to adoption of new methods and slows regulatory uptake. To address this limitation, we survey recent initiatives democratizing computational toxicology through no-code/low-code pipelines, automated workflows, and open-source tools. We emphasize solutions for four computational needs: (i) data extraction and access, (ii) data mining and curation, (iii) data analysis and visualization, and (iv) modeling and prediction. These initiatives transform complex computational methods into guided and web-accessible applications that enable toxicologists, regulators, and researchers to leverage AI without coding expertise. The broad applicability of computational methods will be essential for supporting and scaling federal initiatives that advance human-relevant alternatives to animal testing. We also offer practical considerations for domain-specific tool development, including large language model-based information extraction, chemical structure standardization, interactive chemical grouping, and the development of validated machine learning models, as used in the Modeling and Visualization (MoVIZ) pipeline. The authors map the future of computational toxicology and cheminformatics, one that does not require scientists to become programmers but rather makes sophisticated AI tools more broadly accessible, transparent, and guided through thoughtful interface design, transparent workflows, and open science initiatives.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceToxicologyWorkflowAnimalsAutomationData MiningHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID42212723
PMCPMC13273802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.