Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42212645›Full record

ArticleMuscle & nerve2026

Psychosocial Determinants of Pain in Muscle Biopsy.

Beatrice Labella, Emmanuelle Lacene, Maud Beuvin, Anaïs Chanut, Angeline Madelaine, Favienne Levy-Borsato, Guy Brochier, Clémence Labasse, Guillaume Bassez, Danielle Seilhean and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Muscle & nerve, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Beatrice LabellaNeuromuscular Functional Unit, Department of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6385-8432
Emmanuelle LaceneNeuromuscular Functional Unit, Department of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Maud BeuvinNeuromuscular Morphology Unit, Myology Institute, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Anaïs ChanutNeuromuscular Morphology Unit, Myology Institute, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Angeline MadelaineNeuromuscular Functional Unit, Department of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Favienne Levy-BorsatoNeuromuscular Morphology Unit, Myology Institute, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Guy BrochierNeuromuscular Functional Unit, Department of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Clémence LabasseNeuromuscular Morphology Unit, Myology Institute, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Guillaume BassezDepartment of Neuromyologie, Myology Institute, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Danielle SeilheanNeuromuscular Functional Unit, Department of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Sarah Leonard-LouisNeuromuscular Functional Unit, Department of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Teresinha EvangelistaNeuromuscular Functional Unit, Department of Neuropathology, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire La Pitié-Salpêtrière - Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

aimsOpen muscle biopsy (OMB) is a key diagnostic tool for neuromuscular diseases, though patients often worry about risks and discomfort. This study aimed to assess pain during and after OMB, factors influencing pain perception, and adverse events.

methodsIn this single-center prospective study at the Neuropathology Unit of the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, 100 patients (68 women; mean age 55.4 years) aged ≥ 18 years with suspected myopathy were enrolled from August 2024 to June 2025. Exclusion criteria were inability to understand French, pregnancy, and no social security coverage. Patients completed the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain assessment and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses identified factors associated with procedural pain. Follow-up phone calls were performed at 15 and 30 days postbiopsy.

resultsProcedural pain was mild (median NRS = 2) with moderate and weak positive correlations with preprocedural anxiety (r = 0.54, p < 0.01) and Clinical Frailty Scale scores (r = 0.32, p = 0.02), respectively. Weak negative correlations were observed with satisfaction with staff communication (r = -0.29, p = 0.02) and comfort with medical staff (r = -0.27, p = 0.05). Postprocedural discomfort occurred in 42/83 patients, mostly short-lived. No major complications occurred. DISCUSSION: OMB is a safe procedure. Pain intensity was lower than that generally reported in the literature. Frailty may influence acute pain perception. Preprocedural anxiety emerged as the strongest predictor of pain intensity. Therefore, preprocedural anxiety should be routinely addressed in patients undergoing OMB.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalMuscular DiseasesPainProcedural PainAdultAgedAnxietyBiopsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPain PerceptionProspective Studiesanxietycomplicationsmuscle biopsypainpsychological factors

Identifiers

PMID42212645
PMCPMC13332572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.