ArticleEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2026
'You Can Be Simultaneously Powerful and Marginalised at the Same Time in Different Ways'. An Intersectional Examination of Barriers and Facilitators of Help-Seeking for Eating Disorders by People From Under-Served Groups.
Article in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'You Can Be Simultaneously Powerful and Marginalised at the Same Time in Different Ways'. An Intersectional Examination of Barriers and Facilitators of Help-Seeking for Eating Disorders by People From Under-Served Groups.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026Article
- Primary care use among adults with eating disorders in England: a population-based cohort study using electronic health records.BMJ open · 2026Article
- "We're on the journey now together": a qualitative examination of "close others'" perspectives on barriers and facilitators to help-seeking for eating disorders.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore barriers and facilitators to help-seeking by people from under-served groups in eating disorders (EDs).
methodsSeventeen participants with lived experience of an ED, identifying as members of groups traditionally under-served in ED research (ethnic minority, sexual or gender minority, or men), took part in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, with inductive coding, interpretive theme development, and deductive mapping onto a micro-, meso-, and macro-level intersectional framework.
resultsParticipants identified factors consistent with existing research on barriers and facilitators to help-seeking alongside factors unique to under-served groups. These included internalised stigma, stereotypes about EDs, lack of inclusive environments and poor representation in ED resources. Systemic factors comprised barriers to accessibility or strict inclusion criteria for specialist treatment. Facilitators to help-seeking included inclusive care, and the utility of information seeking online.
conclusionFindings extend existing evidence on ED help-seeking and offer novel insights into experiences of under-served groups in ED. To improve help-seeking among under-served groups, recommendations include interventions to address stigma, challenging stereotypes about EDs, and ensuring inclusive representation in psychoeducation and service provision. At a systemic level, reforms to service commissioning and inclusion criteria are necessary to create equitable access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.