ArticleGerodontology2026
Staging in Gerodontology: A Framework.
Article in Gerodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionComprehensively, systematically and reproducibly assessing and describing the (oral) health status and care needs of older adults is challenging. We aimed to provide a framework for evaluating and reporting older adults' oral health, capturing general and oral function and disease, as well as oral, systemic and socio-economic/social risk factors determining oral care complexity and capability, care needs and levels, and clinical management, including prevention, active and supportive therapy, as well as informing education, research, surveillance and health services. The present paper describes the first aspect, staging of oral health in this population.
methodsEight reviews were conducted to identify risk factors for deterioration of oral health in older adults; existing systematic reviews were further considered during the framework development. A 2.5-day workshop with 31 international researchers and stakeholders was held and a structured consensus process implemented to come to an agreed, internationally applicable framework. A 75% level of agreement was achieved after two rounds of voting.
resultsA case definition based on staging and grading, reflecting the current general and oral health and function, care complexity, and the risk of deterioration of oral health due to local, systemic, and socio-economic and social factors, was developed. Staging includes person-level (based on clinical frailty), function-level (based on clinical and subjective evaluations reflecting oral function, such as tooth loss and oral impacts), and disease-level (including caries, periodontal disease, and oral mucosa assessments) domains.
conclusionOral health staging in older adults can allow clinicians, carers, and policymakers to systematically and comprehensively define and classify patient cases in order to derive appropriate and adequate care. Staging should be used in combination with grading, and both may allow capturing the overall health status and care needs of older patients for health surveillance, research, and education purposes. Next steps will include validation, dissemination, and implementation of the framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.