Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42212503›Full record

ArticleBioethics2026

In Space, No-One Can Hear the Screams of Paternalism: A Response to Häyry's Immorality of Space Exploration.

Steven J Firth

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Bioethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven J FirthUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4391-2910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Matti Häyry has argued that space exploration aimed at human settlement is both irrational and morally impermissible. Such projects, he claims, expose others-including future generations-to serious risks that were not autonomously chosen and which may be harsh, oppressive, and difficult or impossible to escape. Given the increasing institutional interest in extra-planetary habitation, these concerns warrant serious engagement. This paper refutes Häyry's use of the precautionary principle as a decisive moral rule in this context because the principle is ill-suited to long-term, future-directed activities in that it treats abstention as ethically neutral. The moral failure of human settlement in space, if there is one, lies not in space exploration qua activity-but in mission frameworks that exclude normative, social, and philosophical perspectives from their design and governance.

Indexed as

PaternalismSpace FlightHumansMorals

Identifiers

PMID42212503
PMCPMC13293276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.