ReviewHistopathology2026
Updates and controversies in contemporary grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma.
Review in Histopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A decade into the formal adoption of the World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), newer grading concepts, innovative approaches and some issues have emerged. A comprehensive review of the literature on the WHO/ISUP grading system and other grading approaches for CCRCC and PRCC was conducted. Updates and issues are presented on the following: (1) validation studies on WHO/ISUP grading; (2) grade elements including heterogeneity, grades 1 versus 2, types of multinucleated tumour cells, 'grade spectrum' of spindle cells, impact of sarcomatoid change in grade 4 RCC, percent (%) high grade, % sarcomatoid change and rhabdoid change versus sarcomatoid change; (3) grade applications including observer agreement, needle biopsy grade accuracy (correlation with nephrectomy grade) and grading of multifocal RCCs; (4) grade in papillary tumours including heterogeneity and on small (≤1.5 cm) neoplasms; and (5) novel grading or risk categories including incorporation of necrosis into grading and pattern or architectural-based grading. Practice guidance for some of the issues is provided when feasible or where data are sufficient. This review highlights the recent updates and controversies in the use of WHO/ISUP grading and on novel approaches to grading for CCRCC and PRCC. This review may serve as a best practice guide in addressing some of the grading issues and will help identify gaps in our understanding and use of grading for CCRCC and PRCC that can inform future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.