ArticleVirus evolution2026
Unravelling viral identity: avoiding the trap of endogenous sequences for viral surveillance of small ruminant oncogenic retroviruses.
Article in Virus evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small ruminants (sheep and goats) are one of the few mammals in which an exogenous retrovirus (XRV) and closely related endogenous retroviral (ERV) elements coexist within the same host genome. The betaretroviruses Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus (JSRV) and Enzootic Nasal Tumour Virus (ENTV) cause pulmonary and nasal adenocarcinomas, respectively, and share extensive sequence similarity with their endogenous counterparts. Consequently, molecular surveillance must rely on assays that can unequivocally distinguish true exogenous infection from ERV-derived templates; failure to do so compromises diagnosis, phylogenetic inference, and epidemiological conclusions. We retrieved all complete JSRV, ENTV-1/2, and related ERV genomes deposited in public repositories and performed a comprehensive alignment. Only a limited number of genomic segments were capable of distinguishing exogenous from endogenous sequences. We refer to these as discriminating regions (DRs). Phylogenies built using DRs revealed that several entries annotated as XRV are, in fact, ERV-derived or chimeric artefacts generated by short-amplicon reconstruction. A systematic literature review of over 100 articles identified 286 distinct primers and probes used for the XRV amplification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.