ArticleGynecology and pelvic medicine2026
Laparoscopic
Article in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgery serves as a crucial therapeutic modality for gynecological malignancies, occupying a central role in the multimodal treatment framework for common gynecological cancers including cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, and vulvar cancer. Its clinical value extends across the early, middle, and advanced stages of tumors, encompassing multiple therapeutic objectives such as radical resection, cytoreductive therapy, and palliative relief. This video showcases the laparoscopic en bloc excision of enlarged obturator lymph nodes, focusing on key technical strategies for safe and effective dissection in the complex pelvic anatomical region-where close proximity to critical structures like the obturator nerve and iliac blood vessels poses inherent risks. The patient was initially planned for laparoscopic total hysterectomy due to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III (CIN III), with no preoperative imaging or clinical indicators suggesting the need for lymphadenectomy. During the procedure, the surgical team unexpectedly identified enlarged, firm obturator lymph nodes, which postoperative pathological analysis confirmed as metastases from urethral squamous cell carcinoma-a known primary tumor prone to pelvic lymph node spread. The surgical approach prioritized meticulous anatomical landmark identification (including the obturator nerve and vascular bundles), strict adherence to fascial plane boundaries, and combined use of blunt dissection and precise suturing. These techniques minimized the risk of vascular injury and nerve palsy, common complications in pelvic lymphadenectomy. This case underscores the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic management for complex pelvic lymphadenopathy when guided by refined surgical skills, leveraging the technology's high-definition visualization advantage. As a medical educational resource, the video aims to equip surgeons with practical insights to enhance their technical proficiency in dissecting lymph nodes within high-risk anatomical areas, supporting improved intraoperative decision-making and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.