ArticleMethodsX2026
A method description for developing critical reading skills through a digital platform based on Barrett's taxonomy.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The article outlines a method for developing, assessing critical reading skills using a digital learning platform based on Barrett's taxonomy of Reading Comprehension. A taxonomy-based task design is integrated with an automated assessment. The level of questions is categorized into two types: lower-level questions, comprising literal and reorganization levels, and higher-level questions, including inferential, evaluative, and appreciative types. Lower-level comprehension is automatically evaluated with objective questions on the platform. Whereas, higher-level comprehension is assessed through a specifically designed assessment rubric, integrated into the platform. Educators can use the platform architecture for these functions: design and share reading tasks, gather student responses, and define the students' performance through integrated learning analytics. A pilot demonstration with a sample dataset shows the disparities in the students' levels of understanding. Students face challenges in performing high level tasks. The proposed framework illustrates how teaching critical reading can be conducted with the integration of digital platform, Which allows for reproducible implementation A Barrett's taxonomy grounded methodological framework for developing multilevel reading comprehension tasks A digital assessment platform, integrated with automated evaluation of objective questions and rubric-based assessment of open-ended questions An evaluation system supported analytically, informing teachers about students' performance across comprehension levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.