ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Modelling discrete states and long-term dynamics in functional brain networks.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional brain network dynamics underlie fundamental aspects of human cognition and behaviour, including memory, ageing, and a range of clinical disorders. It has been shown that ongoing brain network dynamics can be reliably inferred at fast, sub-second timescales from electrophysiological data using unsupervised machine learning. However, these methods often struggle with inherent trade-offs. For example, Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) have been used to infer categorical brain network states that provide good interpretability but do not model long-range temporal structure. Recently, deep learning approaches using recurrent neural networks (e.g., Dynamic Network Modes) have been proposed to model long-range temporal dependencies, but at the expense of interpretability. In this paper, we introduce Dynamic Network States (DyNeStE) to address this problem. This new model employs amortised Bayesian inference with recurrent neural networks to model long-range temporal structure and uses a Gumbel-Softmax distribution to enforce categorical states for greater interpretability. In both simulations and real resting-state magnetoencephalography data, DyNeStE was able to recover plausible dynamic brain network states and showed superior performance over the HMM in capturing long-range temporal dependencies in network dynamics. These dynamic networks were reproducible across independent data splits and build on established HMM-based findings. Together, these results highlight DyNeStE as an interpretable and temporally informative framework, capable of representing large-scale neural activity as discrete state transitions while capturing transient and long-range brain network dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.