ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Treatment of Posterior Shoulder Instability in National Hockey League Players: A Survey of NHL Team Physicians.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Posterior shoulder instability is a common yet underappreciated condition in elite hockey players. It presents unique treatment dilemmas during both the season and the offseason. Purpose: To investigate treatment trends and decision-making factors among National Hockey League (NHL) team physicians when managing posterior shoulder instability. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A 35-item questionnaire addressing treatment decisions, surgical thresholds, bone loss management, and return-to-play (RTP) protocols was sent to all 32 NHL team orthopaedic surgeons. Data were collected on both in-season and offseason preferences and analyzed as descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 32 invited team physicians, a total of 31 (97%) completed all (n = 29) or most (n = 2) of the survey. For first-time in-season posterior shoulder instability, 100% of physicians chose nonoperative management. For recurrent posterior instability, 35% favored in-season surgery if there was no bone loss, and 74% favored in-season surgery when bone loss was ≥15%. Timing within the season did not influence the majority of surgeons. In the offseason, 39% would recommend offseason surgery for first-time injuries and 48% for recurrent instability without bone loss. Arthroscopic stabilization was the preferred procedure in all soft tissue cases; in cases of bone loss ≥15%, 53% would perform a soft tissue only procedure, and 30% would perform augmentation with distal tibial allograft. RTP was guided by full strength, range of motion, absence of pain, and absence of subjective instability. Conclusion: NHL team physicians strongly favor nonoperative management in-season for first-time posterior shoulder instability events. Recommendation of in-season surgery becomes more likely in the presence of injury recurrence or bone loss. Heterogeneity exists among surgeons regarding the amount of combined bone loss that would lead to the recommendation of a bony procedure. Injury timing during the season rarely alters treatment decisions, and arthroscopic repair remains the standard approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.