ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Comparative effectiveness of budesonide EC and telitacicept in proteinuria and eGFR trajectories in IgA nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide. However, the lack of direct comparative evidence between the emerging targeted therapies, budesonide enteric-coated (EC) capsule and telitacicept, creates uncertainty in clinical decision-making. This study aimed to conduct a head-to-head comparison of their efficacy in reducing proteinuria and preserving renal function, and to explore efficacy stratification based on baseline characteristics. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study at Henan Provincial People's Hospital, including 95 adults with biopsy-proven IgAN who initiated budesonide EC (n ;= ;46) or telitacicept (n ;= ;49) from January 2022 to December 2025. We assessed 6-month changes in 24-hour proteinuria and eGFR using linear mixed-effects models adjusted for prespecified baseline covariates-age, sex, time from biopsy to treatment, baseline proteinuria and eGFR, comorbidities, and concomitant medications. Findings were evaluated in six sensitivity analyses. Results: In this selected cohort of 95 patients with biopsy-proven IgAN, the effect of treatment on proteinuria reduction was modified by baseline proteinuria level (interaction P = 0.003), with greater relative benefit of telitacicept observed at mild-to-moderate baseline proteinuria. This interaction remained significant in a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis (p = 0.003). Budesonide EC was associated with a higher mean eGFR during follow-up in the primary model (β = 4.090 mL/min/1.73 m²; p = 0.018), though this association attenuated and lost statistical significance in the matched cohort (β = 5.022 mL/min/1.73 m²; p = 0.085). Conclusions: The relative antiproteinuric effect of telitacicept versus budesonide EC may be modified by baseline proteinuria, with a possible trend toward greater benefit in patients with mild-to-moderate levels. In contrast, although budesonide EC was associated with higher mean eGFR during follow-up in the primary analysis, this difference attenuated after PSM and likely reflects baseline imbalance rather than a true differential effect on renal trajectory. These observations are limited by the retrospective design and residual confounding, and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.