Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42212011›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Exploring heterogeneous profiles of academic performance among college students: a latent profile and LASSO regression analysis.

Hui Li, Rongrong Guan, Hongyun Zhao, Huiyang Han, Xianfeng Li, Zhenti Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui LiSchool of Medicine, Sias University, Zhengzhou, China.
Rongrong GuanSchool of Art and Design, Zhengzhou University of Industrial Technology, Zhengzhou, China.
Hongyun ZhaoSchool of Engineering, Sias University, Zhengzhou, China.
Huiyang HanSchool of Medicine, Sias University, Zhengzhou, China.
Xianfeng LiSchool of Engineering, Sias University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhenti CuiSchool of Medicine, Sias University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: With the development of higher education, college students face various psychological pressures and challenges. Consequently, academic performance has become a key focus of educational research. This study aims to identify latent categories of academic performance among college students and further explore risk factors associated with these categories. Methods: Employing a convenience sampling strategy, 548 undergraduate students were recruited from universities in Henan Province between May and July 2025, the effective response rate is 94%. Data collection utilized the Family Affluence Scale-III, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Perceived Social Support Scale, Academic Performance Scale, General Procrastination Scale, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale-Student, and demographic questionnaire. Three academic performance-related scales served as observed variables. Latent profile analysis (LPA) identified latent categories of academic performance among college students. Univariate analyses using Chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, or Fisher's exact tests compared characteristics and differences across academic performance categories. Collected variables were incorporated into a relaxed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method based on bootstrap resampling to confirm key factors influencing these categories. Logistic regression analysis was then conducted on the identified factors. Results: Two latent categories of academic performance among college students were identified: "Low Self-Regulators" and "High Self-Regulators." After variable selection via Bootstrap Relaxed LASSO regression, with the "High Self-Regulators" serving as the reference group, logistic regression analysis revealed that general self-efficacy (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = [0.73-0.85], Conclusion: This study adopted a person-centered approach and identified two latent categories of college students' academic performance through latent profile analysis: "Low Self-regulators" (average academic performance and engagement, higher procrastination) and "High Self-regulators" (higher academic performance and engagement, lower procrastination). Further screening via Bootstrap relaxed LASSO regression revealed that general self-efficacy, perceived social support, and purposeful exercise frequency were the most stable predictors of student category membership. These findings provide empirical support for implementing differentiated academic interventions in higher education, suggesting educators should precisely enhance students' academic adaptation and effectiveness by addressing the psychological needs of distinct groups through boosting self-efficacy and strengthening social support systems.

Indexed as

academic performancecollege studentsinfluencing factorsLASSOLPA

Identifiers

PMID42212011
PMCPMC13212273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.