ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026
Microplastics Release From Clear Aligners: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence, Health Implications, and Policy Directions.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clear Aligners as a Prescribed Source of Unmeasured Intra-Oral Micro- and Nanoplastic Exposure: Release Mechanisms, Human Evidence, Salivary Biomonitoring and the EU Regulatory Context.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Microplastics Release From Clear Aligners: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence, Health Implications, and Policy Directions.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the dramatic increase in the use of orthodontic clear aligners in recent years, little is known about the presence of microplastics (MP) and their impact on human health. Through a scoping review study, we hope to map out the worldwide research on this intriguing topic of MP in orthodontic clear aligners. Methods: The eligibility of both published and unpublished articles was determined using a three-stage search strategy suggested by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were thoroughly searched. Only publications in English language were taken into consideration for the study, which included research done worldwide during the previous 10 years to February 2025. At any stage of the selection process, disagreements between the two reviewers over whether to include an article were settled by debate and consultation with a third reviewer. The gathered data was shown using a narrative summary and a PRISMA ScR checklist. This gave an overview of the most recent data about MP in clear aligners. Results: Literature search resulted in 638 articles out of which 250 duplicates were removed. Three hundred and eighty-eight articles were screened for titles and abstracts out of which full text screening of 10 studies were done, and six articles proved the presence and the role of MP in Clear Aligners. Gray literature was also included in the scoping review. Conclusion: It can be concluded that although there is already evidence that transparent aligners release MP when in use, it is still unknown how much of a health danger they present. To solve these issues, more extensive in vivo research and the production of sustainable, safer materials and other policies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.