ReviewGynecology and pelvic medicine2024
Scoping review of evidence-based postoperative recommendations following urogynecology surgery.
Review in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most gynecology and urogynecology surgeons recommend restrictions that include pelvic rest as well as activity and lifting restrictions in the immediate postoperative period. The objective of this review is to summarize the literature on these postoperative restrictions and their health outcomes and surgical success. In addition, we aim to give evidence-based recommendations in the key areas of postoperative care. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search to identify studies discussing post-operative restrictions and recommendations after urogynecologic and benign minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Searches were conducted in the PubMed and the Cochrane Library (1996 to 2023). Results: There is limited prospective data evaluating the role of postoperative activity restriction in benign gynecologic surgery or pelvic reconstructive surgery outcomes and long-term data (>12 months data) is even more scarce. Short-term outcomes including patient satisfaction, anatomic success and complications supports less restriction. Current evidence supports early ambulation, screening for postoperative urinary retention and early advancement in diet to return to bowel function. Conclusions: The current evidence does not support postoperative physical activity restrictions following gynecologic surgery, but more research is needed to fully understand the long-term implications of eliminating these restrictions. The next step in optimizing the postoperative recovery period is research looking at an active recovery similar to what is commonly seen in orthopedic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.