Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211958›Full record

ReviewGynecology and pelvic medicine2024

Are there any limits for laparoscopic myomectomy?-tips & tricks.

Hale Goksever Celik, Ercan Bastu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hale Goksever CelikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Acibadem University Acibadem Fulya Hospital, IVF and Endometriosis Center, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5162-3262
Ercan BastuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nesta Clinic, IVF and Endometriosis Center, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0810-6195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine leiomyomas, also known as fibroids or myoma uteri, are the most common benign pelvic tumor in women. They are monoclonal tumors arising from the smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts of the myometrium. Uterine leiomyomas are usually diagnosed in reproductive-aged women. Determination of the actual prevalence is so difficult because of heterogenous presentation of the disease. Although women having uterine leiomyomas may suffer from abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, pelvic mass, infertility, and obstetric complications, others remain asymptomatic. Approximately one-third of women with uterine leiomyomas will demand treatment depending on the severity of their symptoms Another important issue during management of myomas is the patient's desire for immediate or future childbearing as the therapeutic approaches result in different impacts on fertility. According to localization of uterine leiomyomas, surgical routes may differ in terms of hysteroscopy, laparoscopy or laparotomy. With recent advances in technical developments and increased surgical experiences, laparoscopic myomectomy has started to be preferred for many reasons such as less blood loss and pain, lower complications and adhesion formation, faster post-operative recovery, and shorter duration of hospital stay. The number, size, and location of the fibroids are important factors during decision of laparoscopic or open technique. Despite limited data in literature, different routes have no impact on live birth rate.

Indexed as

fibroidslaparoscopic myomectomyLaparoscopyleiomyomasmyoma uteri

Identifiers

PMID42211958
PMCPMC13215138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.