ReviewGynecology and pelvic medicine2024
Evaluation and management of urinary incontinence in nursing home residents: unique considerations for an at-risk population.
Review in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Individual and Institutional Factors Associated With Urinary Incontinence Among Nursing Home Residents: A Multilevel Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Observational
- Knowledge and Practice of Urinary Incontinence Management Among Nursing Professionals in Serbian Nursing Homes: A Multicentre Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common diagnosis in the nursing home (NH) population, with up to 77% of NH residents having OAB or associated incontinence. NH residents have high rates of medical comorbidities that can impact OAB, such as frailty, decreased cognitive function, and lower functional status. Aside from understanding medical comorbidities, the clinician must also be aware of the nuanced social and structural factors at play due to the NH environment and interactions with nursing staff and caretakers. The American Urological Association and the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogenital Reconstruction have outlined three lines of treatment for OAB: conservative treatment, medical management, and procedural treatments. Care for NH residents differs from the general population, however, due to the unique medical and sociological backgrounds of this population. Functional incontinence concerns should be considered as well. While conservative measures are considered the first-line treatment for OAB, complex structural challenges affect their implementation in NHs. Medical management can be a good option, however anti-cholinergic medications should be limited in the elderly and frail, and beta-3 agonist medications should be favored if no contraindications exist. Lastly, procedural treatments may be appropriate for NH residents and should still be considered in appropriately selected individuals. The aim of this review is to highlight the special considerations for evaluating and managing OAB in the NH population, with a focus on how the NH environment can both impact OAB treatment and patient perceptions regarding urinary symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.