ArticleGynecology and pelvic medicine2024
Temperature predicts attendance at appointments for pelvic-floor muscle related dysfunction differently in publicly and privately funded appointments.
Article in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current study examined how temperature affects attendance at psychological tele-support sessions for women undergoing treatment for pelvic-floor muscle (PFM) related symptoms. It compared this relationship between when the appointments were publicly-funded or privately offered without cost to the patient. This is the first study to compare attendance when both publicly-funded and privately-offered sessions were free. Methods: Session attendance of consequently-referred women with PFM-related dysfunction at a large metropolitan hospital were analysed as a function of type of appointment (publicly versus privately funded), and the temperature in the area where the patient lived at the appointment time. Results: In contrast to previous work, missed appointments were less likely in the publicly-funded UK National Health Service (NHS) system than in a free privately-offered service. Temperature also impacted the two sorts of service differentially: there was a positive association between increasing temperatures and missed appointments without notice in the publicly-funded UK NHS, but not in the privately-funded system. However, there was a positive association between temperature and missed appoints with notice for the privately offered system, but not in the publicly funded system. Conclusions: These results are discussed with respect to the impact of the reputation and trust of the organisations involved, the patient motivations to attend, and the perceived costs and benefits of nonattendance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.