Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211951›Full record

ReviewGynecology and pelvic medicine2024

Uterine fibroids & infertility: which fibroids should be removed?-a narrative review.

Engin Turkgeldi, Uzeyir Kalkan, Baris Ata

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Engin TurkgeldiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5008-3292
Uzeyir KalkanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Baris AtaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Although fibroids are frequent in the infertile population, their high heterogeneity and methodological problems hinder efforts to reach high-quality evidence on their impact on and surgery's role in infertility. Methods: We have searched PubMed from 1980 to September 1 Key Content and Findings: Submucous (SM) and intramuscular (IM) fibroids that distort the uterine cavity are likely to affect fertility adversely and surgical removal of these is recommended. On the contrary, subserosal (SS) fibroids are not thought to have an impact on fertility, therefore removal of these solely for fertility purposes is not recommended. The effect of non-cavity distorting IM fibroids on fertility is still debated, however, the evidence is inclined to suggest that their presence may lower a woman's chance of achieving a live birth. However, whether their surgical removal restores or improves this is a gray area and usually not recommended. However, it can be an option for women with large fibroids, a history of miscarriages, or failed in vitro fertilization (IVF) attempts.The route of myomectomy is also an underinvestigated area. SM and IM fibroids that distort endometrial cavity are best managed hysteroscopically, if not larger than 5 cm. For other fibroids, laparoscopy and laparotomy seem to yield similar reproductive results, but laparoscopy may be preferred for quicker recovery and reduced postoperative pain. Conclusions: Finally, it should be remembered that the majority of data on the relationship between fertility, fibroids and their surgical correction are based on heterogenous, observational studies, providing low-quality evidence, and should be treated with caution.

Indexed as

fertilityFibroidleiomyomamyomectomysurgery

Identifiers

PMID42211951
PMCPMC13215010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.