ReviewGynecology and pelvic medicine2024
Uterine fibroids & infertility: which fibroids should be removed?-a narrative review.
Review in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perinatal Outcomes in Mexican Women with a History of Myomectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Although fibroids are frequent in the infertile population, their high heterogeneity and methodological problems hinder efforts to reach high-quality evidence on their impact on and surgery's role in infertility. Methods: We have searched PubMed from 1980 to September 1 Key Content and Findings: Submucous (SM) and intramuscular (IM) fibroids that distort the uterine cavity are likely to affect fertility adversely and surgical removal of these is recommended. On the contrary, subserosal (SS) fibroids are not thought to have an impact on fertility, therefore removal of these solely for fertility purposes is not recommended. The effect of non-cavity distorting IM fibroids on fertility is still debated, however, the evidence is inclined to suggest that their presence may lower a woman's chance of achieving a live birth. However, whether their surgical removal restores or improves this is a gray area and usually not recommended. However, it can be an option for women with large fibroids, a history of miscarriages, or failed in vitro fertilization (IVF) attempts.The route of myomectomy is also an underinvestigated area. SM and IM fibroids that distort endometrial cavity are best managed hysteroscopically, if not larger than 5 cm. For other fibroids, laparoscopy and laparotomy seem to yield similar reproductive results, but laparoscopy may be preferred for quicker recovery and reduced postoperative pain. Conclusions: Finally, it should be remembered that the majority of data on the relationship between fertility, fibroids and their surgical correction are based on heterogenous, observational studies, providing low-quality evidence, and should be treated with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.