Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211923›Full record

ReviewGynecology and pelvic medicine2025

When should open surgery be preferred for uterine myomas?-a narrative review.

Fulya Kayikcioglu, Burcu Gundogdu Ozturk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecology and pelvic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fulya KayikciogluDepartment of Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1078-0982
Burcu Gundogdu OzturkDepartment of Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2374-9706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Uterine leiomyomas are the most common benign tumors of the female genital tract, affecting approximately 20-40% of women of reproductive age. Clinically, they may present with heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, pressure symptoms, and infertility. There are different treatment modalities depending on the patient's age and expectations, uterine size, the size and localization of the myoma(s), etc. Myomectomy is a key surgical option, particularly for patients who wish to preserve fertility or maintain the uterus. Although minimally invasive approaches are increasingly used, open (abdominal) myomectomy remains a preferred technique for large, numerous, or deeply located fibroids. The aim of this article is to investigate in which patients open abdominal myomectomy should be preferred. In this context, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical treatment methods of fibroids in patients. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were queried using pertinent keywords to retrieve relevant studies with a particular focus on open abdominal myomectomy, mini-laparotomy, laparoscopic and hysteroscopic myomectomy for uterine fibroids. Key Content and Findings: Myomectomy with laparotomy seems to be more appropriate in the presence of an intramural myoma >10-12 cm in size or multiple myomas (≥4) at different sites in the uterus, requiring numerous incisions. Conclusions: Treatment preferences depend on the patient's age and desire to preserve fertility, as well as the clinical presentation of the myoma such as the size, number and location of fibroids, and also the surgical experience of the gynecologist.

Indexed as

fertility outcomeslaparoscopic and hysteroscopic myomectomymini-laparotomyOpen abdominal myomectomyrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID42211923
PMCPMC13215034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.