Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211883›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2026

Validation of the Effectiveness of Visual Feedback Systems in Respiratory Gating Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy.

Ren Umetani, Yuya Miyasaka, Hikaru Souda, Hongbo Chai, Miyu Ishizawa, Yasuhito Hagiwara, Takashi Kaneko, Yoshifumi Yamazawa, Hiraku Sato, Masashi Koto and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ren UmetaniDepartment of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan.
Yuya MiyasakaDepartment of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan.
Hikaru SoudaDepartment of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan.
Hongbo ChaiDepartment of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan.
Miyu IshizawaDepartment of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan.
Yasuhito HagiwaraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Takashi KanekoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Yoshifumi YamazawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.
Hiraku SatoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Masashi KotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Takeo IwaiDepartment of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of respiratory-gated irradiation using visual feedback (VF) in carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT). Furthermore, in patients with liver cancer undergoing CIRT, the treatment times of treatments with and without VF (non-VF) were compared. Material and methods: Thirty-three patients with liver cancer were analyzed. VF system was applied in 10 patients with liver tumors. To evaluate the efficacy of VF, patients treated non-VF were selected as a control group. All treatments were performed under free-breathing conditions in both the VF and non-VF groups. For each VF patient, 1-3 candidate non-VF patients were identified by matching the CTV size and irradiation gate width (amplitude). From these candidates, 1 non-VF patient was selected as a matched control for each VF patient. The average treatment time for each VF patient was compared with that of the corresponding non-VF patient. The effect of the reduced treatment time for VF was calculated by comparing each VF patient with the corresponding non-VF patient. To quantify respiratory variability, the root mean square error and standard deviation were calculated. Results: The treatment time was reduced in 8 of 10 pairs. Further, in 6 of 8 pairs, the treatment time was reduced by more than 5 minutes when using VF compared with non-VF. The RMSE value was significantly reduced at 50% and 100% ( Conclusion: The results suggest that VF contributes to a reduction in treatment time, indicating improved time efficiency during irradiation sessions. In addition, VF improves respiratory waveform reproducibility, which may contribute to enhanced treatment accuracy. Furthermore, shortening the treatment time may reduce the treatment burden on patients and improve overall treatment workflow.

Indexed as

Carbon-ion therapyRespiratory-gated radiotherapyRespiratory motionVisual feedback

Identifiers

PMID42211883
PMCPMC13213793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.