ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
Combining EEG signals from the 2 members of a team to improve event identification.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined the potential of combining EEG signals from multiple individuals to identify critical events in a team task. In this study two subjects played a video game in which they had complementary roles, one player serving as a Bait to distract 5 enemy fortress and the other serving as a Shooter to destroy the fortress. Twenty-one pairs of subjects were analyzed. Critical events, destruction of the fortress and deaths of each player, evoked distinguishable P300-like responses from both players. Fortress kills could be best identified by combining the two EEG signals, while deaths could be best identified by focusing on the response of the player who died. Hidden semi-Markov models (HSMMs) achieved good identification of the events by combining information about the temporal distribution of these critical events with the conditional probability of the EEG activity. These findings indicate that we can track and improve by adaptively merging or selecting the signals from different team members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.