Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211817›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026

Successful coronary sinus reducer implantation in a patient with a pre-existing left ventricular pacing lead: a case report.

Marco Ciardetti, Michele Coceani, Augusto Esposito, Alberto Aimo, Cataldo Palmieri

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco CiardettiFondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, Pisa and Massa 56124, Italy.
Michele CoceaniFondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, Pisa and Massa 56124, Italy.
Augusto EspositoFondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, Pisa and Massa 56124, Italy.
Alberto AimoFondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, Pisa and Massa 56124, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9129-9519
Cataldo PalmieriFondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, Pisa and Massa 56124, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary sinus reducer (CSR) implantation offers symptomatic relief in patients with refractory angina who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy and repeated revascularization procedures. Pre-existing coronary sinus pacing leads can complicate device delivery and raise concerns about lead displacement or venous injury. Case summary: A 77-year-old man with ischaemic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction 33%), a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D; upgraded from a previously implanted implantable cardioverter-defibrillator), and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class III refractory angina after extensive revascularization was evaluated for alternative treatment. Despite multiple interventions addressing recurrent in-stent restenoses, disabling angina persisted, prompting referral for CSR implantation. Right internal jugular venous access was selected for favourable coronary sinus alignment, with ultrasound guidance and use of an extrastiff guidewire and selective venography to delineate anatomy. Advancement of the 12 Fr delivery sheath was impeded by a prominent Thebesian valve; a 5 mm balloon was inflated at the obstruction and then partially inflated to facilitate 'balloon-assisted tracking,' enabling safe sheath passage without injuring the venous wall or disturbing the left ventricular lead. The CSR was deployed in the mid-distal coronary sinus with stable pacing parameters and no immediate procedural complications. During follow-up the patient remained free of angina. Discussion: This case demonstrates technical feasibility and safety of CSR implantation in the setting of a pre-existing left ventricular pacing lead and challenging venous anatomy when meticulous access selection, balloon-assisted tracking, angiographic confirmation, and systematic monitoring of lead electrical parameters are employed.

Indexed as

Case reportCathetherCoronary sinusLeadReducerRefractory angina

Identifiers

PMID42211817
PMCPMC13215471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.