ArticleJournal of human kinetics2026
Effects of Surface Stability on Muscle Activation during Plank Exercise.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare rectus abdominis (RA) and anterior deltoid (AD) muscle activation during plank exercise performed on different unstable surfaces. Sixteen recreationally active males participated in this study. A ground surface was used as a stable surface (SS), whereas gymnastics rings (GR) and the Bosu ball (BB) were used as unstable surfaces. Under the dual instability (DI) condition, participants placed their feet in the GR and elbows on the BB. Participants performed plank exercise under four different conditions. Muscle activation was measured in the upper rectus abdominis (URA), lower rectus abdominis (LRA), and anterior deltoid (AD) muscles during plank exercise. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to statistically compare muscle activation among the conditions. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Analysis showed that URA muscle activity was significantly greater under the DI condition than under the SS and BB conditions. In addition, URA muscle activity was greater under the GR than the SS condition. LRA muscle activity was significantly greater under the DI condition compared to the other conditions. In contrast, AD muscle activity was greater under the SS than the DI condition. In conclusion, these findings indicated that RA muscle activation was greatest on the dual instability surface, while AD muscle activation was greatest on the stable surface. Dual instability plank exercise may be a better choice than single instability and stable surface plank exercise for URA and LRA activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.