Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211803›Full record

ArticleJournal of human kinetics2026

Fact or Fiction? Examining the Veracity of Common Myths Related to 7-meter Throws in Handball.

Aron Laxdal, Per Thomas Byrkjedal, Andreas Ivarsson, Olafur Sigurgeirsson, Tommy Haugen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aron LaxdalDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2239-427X
Per Thomas ByrkjedalDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-9758
Andreas IvarssonDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8987-5975
Olafur SigurgeirssonHBStatz, Seltjarnarnes, Iceland.
Tommy HaugenDepartment of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7909-473X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are several long-standing beliefs that persist in sport despite little or no evidence of them being true. The aim of this study was to assess the veracity of two such beliefs related to 7-meter (7-m) throws in handball: 1) that the fouled players should not take their own 7-m shots as their ability to score is compromised, and 2) that changing the 7-m shooter after a miss is more likely to lead to a goal than letting the player who missed try again. To assess the veracity of these beliefs 10,593 7-m shots from the Icelandic elite division were analyzed using a Bayesian three-level analysis. The results revealed that neither taking your own 7-m shot after being fouled nor taking a 7-m shot after missing the attempt appeared to have a negative effect on the outcome of 7-m shots. Coaches should therefore be able to let their most proficient 7-m shooters take any 7-m shot, regardless of preceding events, without any functional cost.

Indexed as

confirmation biashot hand fallacymomentumpsychological safetyself-taking

Identifiers

PMID42211803
PMCPMC13215230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.