Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211790›Full record

ReviewOcular oncology and pathology2026

Reese, Ellsworth, and the Classification of Retinoblastoma.

Ella R Feiner, David H Abramson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ella R FeinerDepartment of Ophthalmology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
David H AbramsonOphthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This review explores the development and legacy of the Reese-Ellsworth classification system for retinoblastoma, a landmark achievement in pediatric oncology. Summary: We first highlight the history of cancer staging in the early 20th century. Then, we discuss the lives of Algernon B. Reese and Robert M. Ellsworth, two pioneering figures in ophthalmic oncology, and their development of the Reese-Ellsworth classification system in 1963. The system served as the international standard for over 3 decades, stratifying patients by prognosis and enabling standardized treatment protocols and collaborative research that contributed to dramatic improvements in retinoblastoma survival rates. However, as the standard of care shifted from radiation to chemotherapy in the latter half of the 20th century, the system became obsolete and was ultimately replaced. Key Messages: The story of Reese and Ellsworth exemplifies how disease staging systems must adapt to changing therapeutic paradigms while demonstrating the importance of standardized classification in advancing cancer research.

Indexed as

History of medicineReese-Ellsworth classificationRetinoblastoma

Identifiers

PMID42211790
PMCPMC13215677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.