ArticleGenetics in medicine open2026
"It is important to me to know where the information is going": Views of adults with intellectual disability on data sharing in precision medicine research.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Adults with intellectual disability can benefit from precision medicine research (PMR) but their participation in general studies is limited. Although data sharing may be critical for scientific findings to emerge, the views of adults with intellectual disability on data sharing are unknown. Methods: We developed and implemented a survey in collaboration with a multipartner Steering Committee. Questions included general views toward PMR and comfort level with, concerns about, and possible facilitators for data sharing and future uses. Analyses included descriptive statistics and comparison for key demographic characteristics. Results: A total of 150 adults with intellectual disability across racial, ethnic, gender, and guardianship status groups completed the survey. Views on PMR were highly positive, but only 59% were comfortable with data sharing. Participants expressed strong support for data reuses to improve health, quality of life, and understanding of causes of intellectual disability (all 79%) but less for data reuse to prevent intellectual disability (64%). Most reported concerns about data sharing, especially reuses that may harm people with intellectual disability (45%). We found, and discussed, differences in views and concerns by key demographic characteristics and intersectionality. Conclusion: Response to the concerns requires a multilevel approach. Partnership with disability communities can promote enrollment in PMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.