Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211733›Full record

ArticleAquaculture nutrition2026

Farhana Najnine, Xinbo Guo, Junpeng Cai

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aquaculture nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Aquaculture nutrition · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Farhana NajnineSchool of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510641, China, scut.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-5270
Xinbo GuoSchool of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510641, China, scut.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5688-6766
Junpeng CaiSchool of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510641, China, scut.edu.cn.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6404-4536

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics are increasingly incorporated into shrimp aquaculture, yet the comparative efficacy of single‑strain versus mixed‑strain formulations remains insufficiently defined, particularly in relation to gut microbiome remodeling, intestinal architecture, and proteomic determinants of meat quality. A 90‑day randomized grow‑out trial was conducted under semi‑intensive conditions using

Indexed as

4D-DIA proteomicsgut microbiotahigh-throughput sequencingLactobacillus salivariusLitopenaeus vannameimeat qualityprobiotictropical aquaculture

Identifiers

PMID42211733
PMCPMC13213333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.