Trial reportFrontiers in public health2026
Modifying implementation strategies for integration of screening and management of mental disorders, including substance use disorders into other NCD care in Faridabad, Haryana as part of ICMR-MINDS project.
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Despite the growing burden of mental disorders, including substance use disorders (MSUDs) in India, their integration within existing non-communicable disease (NCD) care remains limited. This study documents the process of modification and refinement of implementation strategies. These strategies were originally developed as part of initial models (Model M0, M1, M2, M3…). The strategies aimed to integrate MSUD screening and management within existing NCD care in the Faridabad district of Haryana, India. Methods: This was a mixed-methods implementation study. Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) was used to systematically capture changes to the original set of 51 Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies. Modifications were categorised as planned or unplanned, proactive or reactive. They were analysed based on type (substitution, addition, tailoring, or integration). Stakeholders were purposively recruited based on their role in the design, administration, or delivery of care. These included policy makers, state- and district-level health administrators, facility-level healthcare professionals, and patients/service users and caregivers. Data sources included field notes by the project field staff, digital portal, and dashboard, training reports and meetings of the project group at AIIMS, New Delhi. Additional information for the process came from the co-creation meetings. A total of 81 healthcare professionals from 16 public health facilities participated in training. Stakeholder engagement involved co-creation meetings, field-based observations, structured feedback loops, and consensus-based adaptation cycles. Qualitative data were analysed using a rapid thematic approach guided by the CFIR. Results: Nine strategies were modified substantially. These included revising professional roles, creating new clinical teams, facilitating relay of clinical data to providers, promoting network weaving, intervening with patients/consumers to enhance uptake and adherence, use mass media, conduct ongoing training, shadow other experts, and visit other sites. Workforce shortages, logistical constraints, and the absence of mass media channels were main reasons for modifications. Social incentives were introduced to enhance engagement. The refined implementation strategies were integrated into the successive models (Model M1, M2, M3…Mx). This contributed to the final implementation model development (Model Mx). Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of systematic approach and documentation for adapting implementation strategies to real-world conditions. The modified strategies intend to offer a feasible approach to integrated MSUD care in Faridabad district of Haryana. The findings indicate feasibility and system fit. Further evaluation is required to assess effectiveness and scalability. Clinical trial registration: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=MTEzMTg4&Enc=&userName=, identifier (CTRI/2024/08/072748).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.