ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
COVID-19 legislative response and challenges in Republic of Korea.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review systematically analyzes the longitudinal evolution of South Korea's legal and institutional frameworks from the 2015 MERS outbreak through the COVID-19 pandemic. The study introduces the "Pandemic Response Pentad," an original conceptual model positioning Legislation as the foundational core, mediated by Governance, to drive three interconnected field operations. Based on this framework, Korea's infectious disease control system is evaluated across four operational domains: (1) governance reform and personnel structure enhancement, (2) epidemiological response capabilities and data utilization, (3) medical response system, including vaccination programs and supply stockpiling, and (4) social response mechanisms, encompassing social distancing and the protection of vulnerable populations. While rapid legislative enactments enabled effective disease control, they also generated profound ethical tensions regarding fundamental human rights. To mitigate these unintended socioeconomic consequences, Korea institutionalized extensive statutory compensation mechanisms for healthcare facilities, small business owners, and vaccine injuries. The findings highlight that advancing national research infrastructure and establishing policy-oriented think tanks for future pandemic preparedness strictly require proactive legislative backing. Ultimately, this study provides valuable insights into the critical interplay between legal mandates and institutional resilience in global health crisis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.