Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42211672›Full record

ArticleJournal of arthropod-borne diseases2025

Chemical Composition and Control Potential of

Wail Ismael Hassan, Abbas Ali Zamani, Yousif Dakeel Rashid, Arezoo Jamshidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arthropod-borne diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wail Ismael HassanDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Abbas Ali ZamaniDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Yousif Dakeel RashidDepartment of Biological Control, Al-Mussaib Technical College, Al Furat Al Asat Technical University, Iraq.
Arezoo JamshidiDepartment of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: Crude alkaloid extracts were prepared from both plant parts. Ovicidal, larvicidal, pupicidal and adult repellent effects, were assessed through laboratory bioassays. The chemical profile of the extracts was determined using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). Results: Bioassays demonstrated significant ovicidal activity, with 100% egg mortality at 1% (w/v) concentration. Larvicidal activity was also notable at 1% (w/v). The fruit extract caused 100% mortality across the first three larval instars, while the leaf extract caused 100% mortality in the first two instars and 96.6% in the third. In the fourth instar, larvae showed 93.33 and 91.67% mortality with the fruit and leaf extracts, respectively. The extracts exhibited significant repellent effects, with rates of 63.00% and 60.00% at 1% (w/v) and consistently negative equilibrium ratios. GC-MS analysis showed the fruit extract was rich in insecticidal fatty acid esters, while the leaf extract contained repellent terpenoids like Piperitenone Oxide. Linoleic acid was a major shared compound, potentially underpinning the broad-stage efficacy. Conclusion: These findings support the use of

Indexed as

Common house mosquitoLarvicidal activityMeliaceaeMosquito controlPlant extracts

Identifiers

PMID42211672
PMCPMC13212971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.