ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Microbial community structure and source contribution to the early neovaginal microbiota following penile inversion vaginoplasty.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The process of colonization of the neovagina in the first year after surgical creation is largely unknown. We characterized the microbiota of the donor tissue sites that formed the neovagina, of the gut and of the neovagina itself to evaluate the source of the neovaginal microbiota. Methods: Thirty transgender women assigned male at birth were included. Using Results: Each of the sites was characterized by a specific microbiota. The neovagina was characterized by the second highest bacterial richness and diversity after the gut. The neovaginal microbiota was dominated by anaerobic bacteria of the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidota. The most abundant genera were Discussion: The early neovaginal microbiota is highly diverse, dominated by anaerobic bacteria and is distinct from the microbiota of the tissue sites that form the neovagina. As most neovaginal ASVs are unshared, this indicates that bacteria from other environments may colonize the neovagina in this early period after creation of this new environment. These findings suggest implications for neovaginal health, potentially informing studies on probiotic therapies to support the colonization of the neovagina with beneficial bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.