ReviewNepal journal of epidemiology2026
Perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in resectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Nepal journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer is not responsive to surgery and perioperative chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been effective in advanced disease. This meta-analysis assesses the benefits of the addition of ICIs to perioperative chemotherapy in case of resectable gastric/GEJ cancer. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect were identified until February 2026. Randomized controlled trials with comparison of perioperative ICI with chemotherapy against chemotherapy were included. A random-effects model was used to. Risk ratios was calculated for all the dichotomous outcomes. I Results: Four trials (2,125 patients) were included. ICI plus chemotherapy, however, had significant positive effects on pathological complete response (RR = 2.87; 95% CI: 1.66-4.99; p = 0.018) and complete tumour regression (RR = 2.74; 95% CI: 1.24-6.04; p = 0.006). No significant different was found for R0 resection rates and surgery completion between the two groups. Similarly, no significant different was found for adverse events, surgical morbidity, or deaths. However, immune-related adverse events (RR = 3.18; 95% CI: 2.48-4.08) and treatment discontinuation (RR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11-1.54) were significantly higher in ICI plus chemotherapy group. Conclusion: The inclusion of ICIs in perioperative chemotherapy enhances pathological response and does not pose more surgical risk. Although adverse events were high in the ICI plus chemotherapy group so large scale studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.