ArticleBiomedical sciences instrumentation2022
QUANTIFYING HEAD IMPACT EXPOSURE, MECHANISMS AND KINEMATICS USING INSTRUMENTED MOUTHGUARDS IN MALE HIGH SCHOOL LACROSSE.
Article in Biomedical sciences instrumentation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The male version of lacrosse is a helmeted collision sport, which allows stick checking and body contact. Although changes to checking rules have attempted to reduce the incidence of concussion in male lacrosse, head impacts can occur when stick checking or body contacts are being executed. Few studies have used rigorous video analysis to verify sensor recorded events in male lacrosse. A male high school varsity lacrosse team of 25 players wore the Stanford Instrumented Mouthguard (MiG) during 12 competitive games. Video footage was reviewed to remove false-positive recordings and verify head impacts, which resulted in 13 head impacts over 69 athlete-exposures (0.19 head impacts per athlete-exposure). Of the 13 video-confirmed head impacts, 7 impact events were stick-to-head (53.8%), 3 were body-to-head (23.1%), 1 was head-to-head (7.7%) and the remaining 2 events were indirect impacts involving body-to-body contact with no observable head contact (15.4%). The most common impact site was the front of the head (5, 38.5%), followed by the side (3, 23.1%) and rear (3, 23.1%). The median peak linear acceleration, angular velocity and angular acceleration values of the 13 video-verified impacts were 36.1
Indexed as
Identifiers
42211398PMC13215256What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.